Unified Information Security - Future Internet Summit2024-03-28T14:02:16Zhttp://fisummit.ning.com/forum/topics/unified-information-security?commentId=4150545%3AComment%3A755&x=1&feed=yes&xn_auth=noYes, I was hoping to build a…tag:fisummit.ning.com,2009-10-15:4150545:Comment:7552009-10-15T17:54:31.000ZW. David Sincoskiehttp://fisummit.ning.com/profile/WDavidSincoskie
Yes, I was hoping to build a framework broad enough to cover all uses. In particular, there are very widely varying requirements for security. A public PC at an internet cafe may not have the same requirements for information security as a PC attached to a highly secure financial or military network. I'm trying to capture all of these usage scenarios.<br />
<br />
<cite>Michael O'Donnell said:…</cite>
Yes, I was hoping to build a framework broad enough to cover all uses. In particular, there are very widely varying requirements for security. A public PC at an internet cafe may not have the same requirements for information security as a PC attached to a highly secure financial or military network. I'm trying to capture all of these usage scenarios.<br />
<br />
<cite>Michael O'Donnell said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://www.fisummit.info/forum/topics/unified-information-security?page=1&commentId=4150545%3AComment%3A692&x=1#4150545Comment692"><div>I think that I like this proposal, because I think that it allows work on the various services and qualities that are lumped together as "security" to be addressed <b>without</b> imposing requirements on all uses of the network. I hope that I'm not wrong.</div>
</blockquote> I think that I like this prop…tag:fisummit.ning.com,2009-10-15:4150545:Comment:6922009-10-15T13:33:20.000ZMichael O'Donnellhttp://fisummit.ning.com/profile/MichaelODonnell
I think that I like this proposal, because I think that it allows work on the various services and qualities that are lumped together as "security" to be addressed <b>without</b> imposing requirements on all uses of the network. I hope that I'm not wrong.
I think that I like this proposal, because I think that it allows work on the various services and qualities that are lumped together as "security" to be addressed <b>without</b> imposing requirements on all uses of the network. I hope that I'm not wrong.